Amorphous Solar Panel Vs Polycrystalline

Polycrystalline cells are generally 13 15 efficient.

Amorphous solar panel vs polycrystalline.

They can also withstand the summer heat where mono or polycrystalline panels lose efficiency in the same ambient temperatures. Their conversion efficiency of sunlight to electricity is 6 3 about half that of polycrystalline or monocrystalline panels. Amorphous cells can withstand higher temperatures without output being affected compared to poly or mono crystalline cells. Amorphous panels are also lighter in weight and more portable than monocrystalline or polycrystalline panels producing the same amount of energy.

Amorphous panels are in the 8 9 efficiency range. Thus an array of amorphous panels will require about twice as much roof space as an array with a similar rating using other types of panels. Polycrystalline panels sometimes referred to as multicrystalline panels are popular among homeowners looking to install solar panels on a budget. Usually polycrystalline silicon solar cells won t have the corners cut off of them so you won t see the large white spaces on the front of the panel that you see on monocrystalline panels.

If you re looking to get the lowest cost system then amorphous is the way to go. Amorphous cells are constructed from a fine layer of silicon which enables solar panels to be more flexible and therefore lightweight. In all our grid connect packages we only use good quality poly or monocrystalline panels except in very specific circumstances for the. Quite often we re asked about the advantages of monocrystalline panels and polycrystalline solar modules over their amorphous thin film counterparts.